Office Buildings

New York Times Building
BMW DesignWorksUSA
State Compensation Insurance Fund
CalTrans District HQ
FuturePlex Office Complex
Johnson International HQ
Corporate Campus
Nike European HQ
GAP Corporate Campus
Patagonia Corporate Campus

Museums

Environmental Centers

Hotels

Airports

Schools

Retails

Housing

Others


5806 Lawton Avenue,
Oakland, CA 94618
510.547.4199 vce
510.653.3763 fax
L+U@coolshadow.com


State Compensation Insurance Fund Building

State Compensation Insurance Fund Building
Architect: HOK San Francisco
Location: San Francisco, CA
Status: Contract Document Phase

 


View from northwest showing existing building (right) and proposed building with rooftop PV array

 


Plan with DOE2.1e zones indicated

Building sectionNW to SE

Scheduled to be occupied by 2004, this 289,000 square foot office building sits just southeast of an older 16 story building owned and occupied by the same client in downtown San Francisco. LEED certification has been a goal for the owner since the start of the project and the design team has taken performance issues seriously from the initial design stages of the project. We joined the team early in the schematic design process and worked through construction documents as daylighting, shading, glazing and alternative energy consultants. On this project our role in the Value Engineering meetings was critical for the integrated curtain wall/daylighting/mechanical strategies to retain their components and performance.

The building is 12 stories tall with an angled northwest window wall that reduces the area of the floor plates as the building goes up, admitting daylight into the plaza created between the two buildings. Due to the street grid south of Market in San Francisco, the elevations are oriented off the cardinal to the NE, SE, SW and NW. The constricted site and need to maximize usable floor area led to a large, rectangular building plate (average of 140 feet by 184 feet) with a central core. This leaves deep 54 foot office bays to be sidelighted as much as possible from only one side on the northwest and southeast and narrower bays on the southwest and northeast. Recognizing site height restrictions, the floor to floor dimension is 13'-9" with a 9'-10" floor to ceiling height to accommodate deep beams for the long spans.

The design team undertook a serious attempt to maximize daylight and comfort in the office floors in spite of the relatively deep plan and low ceiling height. We used extensive DOE2 parametric modeling early in the schematic design phase to quanitfy the impact of curtain wall designs, glazing specifications and mechanical strategies. These studies enabled the mechanical design to optimize the underfloor air distribution design, with a ceiling plenum is used for the return air. Thermal modeling convinced the team that perimeter reheat could be dropped from the mechanical design if the curtain wall design was changed to improve the U-value of the glazing and the spandrel panels were more heavily insulated. If necessary, local reheat units can be dropped in to solve an individual comfort problem once the building is occupied.

On the southeast curtain wall, light-redirecting glass (Serraglaze) was modeled and then specified for the clerestory glazing. Tests demonstrated that this would deliver daylight much farther into the office plan than usually achievable with a simple high clerestory design. Work with various glass manufacturers and suppliers determined that we could economically, and in a time sensitive job, specify this material for the first U.S. architectural application. To improve the visual quality of the workspace, the column line was moved back from the window wall the ceiling at the perimeter and the deeper office space is daylight with reflected light from a combination exterior overhang and interior light shelf. We worked to size and detail the overhang and light shelf to work together to block direct sun penetration through the clerestory glass. The view glass will be shaded with manually controlled diffuse roller shades as desired by the occupants.

On the northwest slanted curtain wall, the low angle sun penetration during summer months poses a [rpblem of visual comfort. After reviewing a number of options, we recommended the use of OkaSolar in the clerestory light. OkaSolar is imported from Germany (information is available for the United States at http://www.us.schott.com). This product is an integrated louver unit designed to redirect direct beam radiation toward the ceiling rather than allowing it to penetrate deep into the office floor. A tracked roller shade will then be used on the view glass to control sun penetration. Although quite expensive, the OkaSolar is specified for just the northwest elevation clerestory where it is the highest performing glazing for the task. The total cost is very small within the overall building budget. The shorter northeast and southwest curtain walls do not have to deliver daylight as deeply as the other two elevations. However, shading is still serious issue on these elevations. We helped the architects to design deep horizontal grates as exterior overhangs and suggested a strategy of assigning interior spaces tolerant to direct beam radiation to these areas.

We were also asked to develop recommendations for the use of PVÕs on this downtown, mid-rise building. We provided the team with recommendations as to the type, area and location of the PV arrays which would best balance cost and performance in this difficult urban site. In addition, we are working with the design team to explore the use of an underground river for heat rejection.


Site shading study for lobby

Serraglaze test cell

OkaSolar testing with physical model


Typical plan indicating daylighted zone


Southeast curtain wall section

Northwest curtain wall section